[ale] Stupid M$ windows crappy software %#$^*(

[Geoffrey]

Ron Nottingham wrote:
> "Jordi S. Bunster" wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:07, Christopher R. Curzio wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Unless they need bleeding edge stuff and/or USB support, install Windows
>>>95B. I find it infinitely more stable than 98, and most apps that run
>>>under 98 will run under 95.
>>
>>Don't know much about Windows, I confess. But my brother (Who thinks he
>>does) *says* he runs 95C. Does that even exists? If it does, is it
>>better than 95B?
>>
> 
> 
> Yes, there is a 95c.  It's a cross between 95b and 98.  I think it is
> better than 95b.  I'm not a fan of 95, I prefer 98SE.  Works much
> better, IMO.  My preferences for Windows?  XP Pro, 98SE, XP Home, 95c,
> 95b, 98, 95, 3.11, 3.1, 3.0, 2.0, ME.  I prefer Linux to any of those,
> though.  BTW, I've had 98SE installed on one machine since day 1 that SE
> came out, and it hasn't given the BSOD, had to be reinstalled, crashed,
> locked, anything, it just keeps chugging along.

I like bay windows..

> 


-- 
Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric at 3times25.net

I didn't have to buy my radio from a specific company to listen
to FM, why doesn't that apply to the Internet (anymore...)?


---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.