[ale] Duplicity very slow

[James Sumners]

~shrug~ I'm actually avoiding the encryption feature. I use it for the easy
interface to restore specific files and automatically rotating a full
backup every few days. But I also needed a way to store my backups on a
Windows server so that they'd be included on the tape backups (not handled
by me). So the tar volumes were the biggest selling point.

But now we're looking at better solutions. We like the look of, and think
we're getting, Unitrends's product --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=20&v=AGdZ-CY5tVk . So I hopefully won't be
using duplicity too much longer.

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Edward Holcroft <eholcroft at mkainc.com>
wrote:

> Maybe I should bite the bullet, do a full backup for as long as it takes,
> and then see how long a differential takes. If differentials are reasonably
> quick, then I don't have a problem ... I guess. Maybe it is just to do with
> those initial calcs ... still, compared to plain old rsync, seems a heavy
> price to pay for just adding encryption.
>
> ed
>
>

-- 
James Sumners
http://james.sumners.info/ (technical profile)
http://jrfom.com/ (personal site)
http://haplo.bandcamp.com/ (band page)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20150422/25d1b412/attachment.html>