[ale] systemd or not

[Damon L. Chesser]

Now, that sounds interesting.



On 09/08/2014 03:55 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 15:04 -0400, James Sumners wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> E != Gnome :-(
>>>
>>> E has a reputation for long devel cycles and really good stuff on release.
>>> Gnome cranks out stuff ans usually hits date targets and often delivers
>>> crap but occasionally hands over a jewel. I need to look at E again. Been a
>>> long time.
>>>
>> Yep. And the only reason I switched to XFCE instead of (back to) E was down
>> to everything of any use was built on GTK+.
> Ah!  But E is a window manager while XFCE is a desktop/session manager.
> I run XFCE with E16 as my window manager.  They're not at all
> incompatible and not particularly hard to switch to.
>
> Yes, you can run "pure E" as a desktop manager as well, but I do like
> having the panels ala GNOME < 3 and XFCE, while E gives me all the
> workspaces I want with as many viewports wide an high as I want while I
> still run XFCE and it's panels.
>
> Regards,
> Mike

-- 
Damon at damtek.com
404-271-8699