[ale] Linux replacements for some M$-based junk

[runman at speedfactory.net]

Weeeeellll, I based my recommendation on cost.

Win4Lin: $60.00
1 hour of a good java programmer's time: $60.00

I don't think anyone can do an entire program in 60 minutes.  Also, java can be really slow unless it is really tuned (read: more $$$$).

Also, what you are gaining is 1) using windows in a more stable invironment, 2) using windows in a more secure environment, and 3) not having to buy any more boxes (cheap as they are).  However, if they have an extra machine that is not networked and the data is backed up, then I feel you are exactly correct.

Of course, one solution is always to do nothing.

Greg

> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, J.M. Taylor wrote:
> > I'll second the Win4Lin for the windows apps.
> > If they want to replace the Access thing, it's been my experience that
> > anything in Access can be recreated by a competent programmer with
> > mysql/php or perl or java or other language in a short period of time, and
> > it'll be aeons more reliable.
> 
> To give a dissenting opinion...if they have to launch a whole virtual
> Windows to run one or both of these, is that really a good reason to move?
> Seems to me you are recommending them to spend $xx for this win4lin
> package so they can still run something they are currently runningwith no
> additional cost.
> 
> As for the php/perl to replace an access app - I'm assuming you're talking
> web based.  That really changes the whole way the app would work and
> interact compared to an Access Form based app.  Java would be a much
> better solution (plus you could pitch it as now being cross-platform :)
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>