[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [ale] Red Hat and the GPL]]
Bob Toxen
bob at verysecurelinux.com
Mon Dec 15 21:44:08 EST 2003
Thanks for that useful information.
Bob
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 09:49:01PM -0500, Jonathan Glass wrote:
> From the horse's mouth.
>
> Jonathan Glass
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Return-Path: <bcole at redhat.com>
> Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by
> katrina.ibb.gatech.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBCIbgDL024322
> for <jonathan.glass at ibb.gatech.edu>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:37:42 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
> [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
> hBCIbf225936 for <jonathan.glass at ibb.gatech.edu>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003
> 13:37:41 -0500
> Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com
> [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP
> id hBCIbf227172 for <jonathan.glass at ibb.gatech.edu>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003
> 13:37:41 -0500
> Received: from redhat.com (bcole.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.57.89]) by
> pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBCIbf6m028628 for
> <jonathan.glass at ibb.gatech.edu>; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:37:41 -0500
> Message-ID: <3FDA0AF5.4090400 at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:37:41 -0500
> From: Brian Cole <bcole at redhat.com>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2)
> Gecko/20030829
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: Jonathan Glass <jonathan.glass at ibb.gatech.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [ale] Red Hat and the GPL]
> References: <1071006052.21619.72.camel at ibb-250>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
> katrina.ibb.gatech.edu
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_COST autolearn=no
> version=2.60
> X-Spam-Level: *
>
>
>
> Jonathan,
>
> I am sorry I did not respond to you sooner.
>
> In December 2002 we submitted a full copy of the RHEL Subscription
> Agreement to legal counsel for the Free Software Foundation for review
> along with our background explanation on how it is intended to work and
> why we don't believe it violates the GPL. Outside counsel for the FSF
> completed his review and concurred that there is nothing in this model
> that inherently violates the GPL.
>
> If you need further clarification let me know. Obviously our legal
> counsel has reviewed all of our agreements before we used them. We are
> not inviolation of the GPL.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> Jonathan Glass wrote:
>
> >-----Forwarded Message-----
> >From: Bob Toxen <bob at verysecurelinux.com>
> >To: ale at ale.org
> >Subject: [ale] Red Hat and the GPL
> >Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:51:39 -0500
> >
> >The individual copyright holders of the software that comprise the
> >Linux OS and related user and library code should tell Red Hat: "NO!
> >You cannot do that [putting restrictions on GPL'ed code] and must stop
> >now!"
> >
> >"NO! You cannot distribute OUR copyrighted code on the condition that
> >the Red Hat customer agree to additional restrictions such as:
> >
> > 1. Not distributing patches among all of your machines and clients.
> >
> > 2. Charging fees in excess of reasonable copying fees for distributing
> > GPL-licensed Open Source
> >
> > 3. A purchaser of a Red Hat CD-ROM (or downloaded CD-ROM image) cannot
> > distribute it "because of red hat trademark logos".
> >
> >Red Hat currently is doing these things and I think that this constitutes
> >copyright infringement in that they are using copyrighted code in ways
> >clearly forbidden by the GPL.
> >
> >Have a look at the GPL at
> >
> > http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl.html
> >
> >as I did in preparing this email. It appears to me that Red Hat is
> >in violation of the GPL for demanding these restrictions of its customers.
> >
> >The portions of the GPL that seem most relevant to me are:
> >
> > "To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid
> > anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the
> > rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for
> > you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.
> > ...
> > "You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy,
> > and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange
> > for a fee.
> >Warranty protection means, I believe, that Red Hat may charge money for
> >fixing bugs. However, it cannot put "per seat" or "per system"
> >restrictions
> >or fees on patches for GPL'ed code. I.e., they must make patches (usually
> >engineered by an Open Source entity other than Red Hat) available for a
> >low cost or at no cost.
> > ...
> > "These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If
> > identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program,
> > and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
> > themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
> > sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you
> > distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work
> > based on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the
> > terms of this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend
> > to the entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of
> > who wrote it.
> >
> >That requirement seems to make illegal Red Hat's published policy of
> >forbidding others from redistributing "Red Hat Linux" in either original
> >or modified form claiming that to do so would be illegally using Red Hat's
> >trademarked images scattered throughout the boot process, documentation,
> >and elsewhere. It appears to me the "These requirements apply to the
> >modified work as a whole." requirement of the GPL expressly forbid
> >this practice.
> >
> > "6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on
> > the Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from
> > the original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program
> > subject to these terms and conditions. You may not impose any
> > further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights
> > granted herein.
> >
> >
> >
> >I suggest that we contact some of the copyright holders of GPL'ed code
> >and see if there's agreement to contact Red Hat and tell them to stop
> >their current practice as it is bad for Linux and the community.
> >
> >(While I consider myself more knowledgeable in contract and copyright
> >law than the average person, I am not an attorney. Any statements by
> >myself here are my opinion.)
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Bob Toxen, CTO
> >Fly-By-Day Consulting, Inc.
> >
> >Author,
> >"Real World Linux Security: Intrusion Detection, Prevention, and Recovery"
> >2nd Ed., Prentice Hall, (C) 2003, 848 pages, ISBN: 0130464562
> >Also available in Japanese, Chinese, and Czech.
> >
> >http://www.verysecurelinux.com [Network & Linux/Unix Security
> >Consulting]
> >http://www.realworldlinuxsecurity.com [My 5* book: "Real World Linux
> >Security"]
> >http://www.verysecurelinux.com/sunset.html [Sunset
> >Computer]
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ale mailing list
> >Ale at ale.org
> >http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >
> >
>
> --
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Brian S. Cole Phone- 919.754.3744
> Account Manager Toll Free- 888.733.4281 x43744
> East Coast Public Sector Cell Phone- 919.696.4395
> Email- bcole at redhat.com Fax - 919.754.3708
>
> Red Hat Academy Information: https://www.redhat.com/training/academy/
> Red Hat Education Solutions:
> http://www.redhat.com/solutions/industries/education/
> Have you heard about the exciting line of enterprise products from Red
> Hat?: http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/
> Does your organization publish content online? Here's a solution:
> http://www.redhat.com/software/ccm/cms/
> Available whitepapers from Red Hat: http://www.redhat.com/whitepapers/
> Training available from Red Hat: http://www.redhat.com/training/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
More information about the Ale
mailing list