[ale] [Fwd: failure notice] ALE message

James P. Kinney III jkinney at localnetsolutions.com
Thu Oct 11 13:48:24 EDT 2001 

I replied to an ale message and I got back a bounce notice. What gives?

-----Forwarded Message-----

From: MAILER-DAEMON at mail.room17.com
To: ale at ale.org
To: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com
Subject: failure notice
Date: 11 Oct 2001 17:49:55 +0000

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.room17.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<ale at ale.org>:
ezmlm-send: fatal: message already has a Mailing-List header (maybe I should be a sublist) (#5.7.2)

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Received: (qmail 25276 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2001 17:49:54 -0000
Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net (207.69.200.60)
  by ns.room17.com with SMTP; 11 Oct 2001 17:49:54 -0000
Received: from archimedes.localnetsolutions.com (archimedes.localnetsolutions.com [199.174.105.194])
	by hall.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA19944;
	Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:49:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by archimedes.localnetsolutions.com (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f9BHgbN14128;
	Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:42:37 -0400
Subject: RE: [ale] RPM displays error msg
From: "James P. Kinney III" <jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
To: ale at ale.org
To: John Mills <john.m.mills at alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
Mailing-List: contact ale-help at ale.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
list-help: <mailto:ale-help at ale.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:ale-unsubscribe at ale.org>
list-post: <mailto:ale at ale.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ale at ale.org
X-Authentication-Warning: otter.mills-atl.com: jmills owned process doing
	-bs
X-Sender: jmills at otter.mills-atl.com
Reply-To: John Mills <john.m.mills at alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CCBA605620E6D211BB600008C7B176C43A508B at premess01.premtec.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110111343130.3442-100000 at otter.mills-atl.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110111343130.3442-100000 at otter.mills-atl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-0/9D2MbmzXgcJwOSmO8g"
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15.99+cvs.2001.10.09.08.08 (Preview Release)
Date: 11 Oct 2001 13:42:37 -0400
Message-Id: <1002822157.14027.5.camel at archimedes.localnetsolutions.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-0/9D2MbmzXgcJwOSmO8g
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

What you are looking for is the BerkelyDB3 upgrade. RedHat switched to
the DB3 format with rpm v.4 . There were some good reasons to do it. But
as with all low-level component upgrades, it a PIA.

Here's the list you need to do all at once:
 db3-3.1.14-0.3.6x.i386.rpm
        db3-devel-3.1.14-0.3.6x.i386.rpm
        db3-utils-3.1.14-0.3.6x.i386.rpm
        rpm-build-4.0-6x.i386.rpm
        rpm-devel-4.0-6x.i386.rpm
        popt-1.6-6x.i386.rpm
        rpm-python-4.0-6x.i386.rpm
        rpm-4.0-6x.i386.rpm

put it all in a directory and upgrade with rpm -Uvh *.rpm

On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 13:48, John Mills wrote:
> ALErs -
>=20
> I'm glad this to see this thread, because I have a related problem.  I
> went to install some RH6.2 update (I forget which one), and found I neede=
d
> to upgrade 'rpm', and sure enough there is an upgrade for RH6.2. _But_ to
> upgrade 'rpm' I need to upgrade or install a 'libdb' (or similar), and I
> can't find the baseline or upgrade 'rpm' for anything than looks similar.
>=20
> Any suggestions on this?
>=20
> TIA
>  - Mills
>=20
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Yu, Jerry wrote:
>=20
> > John,
> > Redhat started to use version 4 'rpm' format for RH7.*. For those stuck=
 with
> > RH6.2, you can update your 'rpm' package to rpm-4.0.2-6x, which you can=
 find
> > from update.redhat.com or its mirrrors. speakeasy.rpmfind.net is quite =
a
> > reliable resource for me over the years.=20
> > Of course, as Keith stated, having the upgraded 'rpm' executable cannot
> > gurantee you can install RPM packages which is compiled with different
> > library and stuff. It only gurantees that you can run rpm command again=
st
> > RPM packages in >4.0 version format.
>=20
>=20
> ---
> This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should=
 be=20
> sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
>=20
--=20
James P. Kinney III   \Changing the mobile computing world/
President and COO      \          one Linux user         /
Local Net Solutions,LLC \           at a time.          /
770-493-8244             \.___________________________./

GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint =3D 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7=20



--=-0/9D2MbmzXgcJwOSmO8g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA7xdoNYZCtw4KcbKcRAvgVAJ9maA/ZIQT+Am+dUeMvp/F6clz4mACgkjJi
IO85FimaJVegj6cl4xVVxBY=
=np6X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-0/9D2MbmzXgcJwOSmO8g--


 PGP signature

More information about the Ale mailing list