[ale] Yup... Jacktrip or Jamulus KILLS Cisco Router??

[neal at mnopltd.com]

Thanks for the reply.  Yes, it does NAT everything.   The weird thing is 
that thus far DNS is the thing that it starts garbling.   If you already 
have an IP address, it continues to NAT that ok.   Not terribly useful 
in practice, only for diagnosis.

On 2021-02-16 12:01, Raj Wurttemberg via Ale wrote:
> Hey Neal,
> 
> Apologies if this was mentioned or asked before, but why not just NAT
> everything?  As long as the ports are NATted back to the source it
> shouldn't matter.
> 
> I have several pfSense firewall-routers in place at various sites and
> have never had any problems NATting any application or service.
> 
> Thanks,
> /Raj
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ale <ale-bounces at ale.org> On Behalf Of Neal Rhodes via Ale
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 11:21 AM
>> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
>> Subject: Re: [ale] Yup... Jacktrip or Jamulus KILLS Cisco Router??
>> 
>> Subsequent failure last night looks like the Cisco Router crapped in 
>> its
>> own nest.
>> 
>>  From the router itself:
>> 
>> traceroute to 75.75.76.76 (75.75.76.76), 10 hops max, 40 byte packets
>>   1  * * *
>>   2  * * *
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> https://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo