[ale] Hypervisors and such
Kyle Brieden
kyle at txmoose.com
Fri Apr 6 16:17:10 EDT 2018
> But containers aren't hypervisors, so it seems the requirements need
> revisiting for clarification.
Yes, fair point! I didn't mean to imply that I was looking for a hvz to
run containers. I simply meant that ProxMox has some value add in that
it manages containers as well as VMs through it's GUI.
As far as virt-manager, I do recall learning to use that wwwaaaayyyy
back in 2011 or 2012ish. I'll give that another look. I'm fine with
spinning up a VM that is a docker-host. No issues there. I just had
draw to proxmox, again, because it was pretty and all in one place.
If you have multiple VM host machines, does virt-manager/libvirt/KVM
handle migrations between devices and such, or is that value add that
another tool/product provides while utilizing KVM under the hood? I
don't think it did back in the day, but time flies and things change.
---
Very respectfully,
Kyle Brieden
On 06-04-2018 13:45, DJ-Pfulio via Ale wrote:
> I'm full of something, including opinions.
>
> But containers aren't hypervisors, so it seems the requirements need
> revisiting for clarification.
>
> ;)
>
> I switched from Xen to KVM around 2010-ish. Never regretted that.
> virt-manager is bonehead easy to use. No root required. If you have
> fewer than 50 VMs, I'd suggest that any heavier solution isn't worth
> it.
>
> I don't have any clue about Docker support in libvirt, but I would be
> shocked if it wasn't there or in the short-list plans.
>
> Some people have reported issues with using CentOS + oVirt to run
> Ubuntu
> Server VMs and having the Ubuntu VMs lock up every few weeks. I'm not
> seeing that, but not using CentOS as a host.
>
> I thought that running all containers inside a full VM was the current
> "best practice" for security. Has that changed?
>
>
> On 04/06/2018 01:19 PM, Kyle Brieden via Ale wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I'm looking to redo my hypervisor at home, and having some trouble
>> landing on a decision, so I'd like some input from y'all. Something
>> just tells me there's gotta be some strong opinions on this floating
>> around this list.
>>
>> Background:
>> Current HVZ is Xen 4.4.2, with Dom0 being Ubuntu 14.04 because, at the
>> time back in 2015, that was the LTS that had the most up to date Xen
>> packages. I do most everything via CLI, from creating config files to
>> setting up LVM volumes for backing each machine. VM system storage is
>> local to the hypervisor, and larger storage is NFS exported to VMs
>> from
>> my FreeNAS box.
>>
>> Wants:
>> I am kind of tired of doing everything via CLI. I'm getting lazier
>> these days, so I want something that has a usable, understandable
>> GUI.
>> I was considering ProxMox for it's additional container management,
>> but
>> they're LXC containers. I've nothing against LXC containers, but I
>> use
>> docker daily, and it doesn't behoove me to learn a second technology
>> just for at home, especially when Docker has the momentum and
>> community
>> that it has.
>>
>> I also want something that I can keep up to date without having to do
>> a
>> fresh install with a new major version. Insert jokes about Arch Linux
>> rolling release model here.
>>
>> Thanks for the opinions, everyone!
>>
>> ---
>> Very respectfully,
>> Kyle Brieden
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> https://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x89C9D831.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3053 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20180406/cdf8c194/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20180406/cdf8c194/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ale
mailing list