[ale] systemd bad. Very bad.

[Steve Litt]

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:11:43 -0400
Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:06:12 -0400
> Kyle Brieden <kyle at txmoose.com> wrote:
> 
> > I haven't been a fan of systemd ever since Arch implemented it
> > however long ago.  I don't care for the binary logging format, nor
> > do I care for the monolithic nature of it.  That being said, I
> > understand that we can't just keep rolling with the init systems
> > that we have, because technology grows and changes.  Those init
> > systems weren't written to handle new technologies and methods.  
> 
> What init systems do you think we have? What do you know about them?
> Have you ever used them?

Reading my preceding 3 questions, they sound snarky. So let me rewrite
them...

* Which init systems are you aware of? There are many.

* How much information, provided by the init system projects, do you
  have for each of them. A lot of them have gotten little publicity.

* Which Linux-appropriate init systems, besides sysvinit, upstart, and
  systemd, have you used for more than a few hours?

Thanks,
 
SteveT

Steve Litt 
June 2017 featured book: The Key to Everyday Excellence
http://www.troubleshooters.com/key