[ale] Recommendations for Two factor authenticaton on Linux (RHEL)? - OT - Legal Disclaimers - Further OT - Taking OT

[Boris Borisov]

Who you talking about?

On Tuesday, April 14, 2015, dev null zero two <dev.null.02 at gmail.com> wrote:

> all we're missing now is our dear friend who was banned from this list and
> we'd have ourselves a rodeo! :-P
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jim.kinney at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> We have topics?
>>
>> What is this formatting style of which you speak? Sounds like something
>> done at ye old typesetting shoppe. Threads are worked into existence by
>> spinning wheels.
>>
>> (Jump ahead 6 weeks)
>>
>> [[[[[[[ OT] New rant] response to rant] RANT] <rant> OT] New Topic] new
>> topic: was OT Then rant then OOT from OP rant] to many nested OT posts...
>> On Apr 14, 2015 10:28 AM, "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner at dsservices.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','JLightner at dsservices.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> When going off topic from the original thread please add "OT - <rant
>>> subject>" to the subject so the OP at least can distinguish which responses
>>> are on topic from those that aren't.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ale-bounces at ale.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ale-bounces at ale.org');> [mailto:
>>> ale-bounces at ale.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ale-bounces at ale.org');>] On Behalf Of Ben
>>> Coleman
>>> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 2:36 PM
>>> To: ale at ale.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ale at ale.org');>
>>> Subject: Re: [ale] Recommendations for Two factor authenticaton on Linux
>>> (RHEL)?
>>>
>>> On 4/13/2015 12:55, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
>>> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or
>>> > confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended
>>> > recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
>>> > copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is
>>> > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
>>> > transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you
>>> > have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you
>>>
>>> Do your legal people actually believe this has any legal force?  I could
>>> be wrong (IANAL), but I don't think you can unilaterally impose conditions
>>> on unrelated parties with whom you don't have any legal relationship.
>>>
>>> I'm assuming that the office email system slaps this on all outgoing
>>> emails?
>>>
>>> Ben
>>> --
>>> Ben Coleman oloryn at benshome.net
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','oloryn at benshome.net');> | For the wise
>>> man, doing right trumps
>>> http://oloryn.benshome.net/     | looking right.  For the fool, looking
>>> Amateur Radio NJ8J              | right trumps doing right.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ale mailing list
>>> Ale at ale.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Ale at ale.org');>
>>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Ale at ale.org');>
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>>
>>
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20150414/3aacc5e8/attachment.html>