[ale] Recommendations for Two factor authenticaton on Linux (RHEL)? - OT - Legal Disclaimers - Further OT - Taking OT

[Lightner, Jeff]

When going off topic from the original thread please add "OT - <rant subject>" to the subject so the OP at least can distinguish which responses are on topic from those that aren't.


-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Ben Coleman
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 2:36 PM
To: ale at ale.org
Subject: Re: [ale] Recommendations for Two factor authenticaton on Linux (RHEL)?

On 4/13/2015 12:55, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or 
> confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended 
> recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
> copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is 
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic 
> transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you 
> have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you

Do your legal people actually believe this has any legal force?  I could be wrong (IANAL), but I don't think you can unilaterally impose conditions on unrelated parties with whom you don't have any legal relationship.

I'm assuming that the office email system slaps this on all outgoing emails?

Ben
--
Ben Coleman oloryn at benshome.net | For the wise man, doing right trumps
http://oloryn.benshome.net/     | looking right.  For the fool, looking
Amateur Radio NJ8J              | right trumps doing right.