[ale] {Disarmed} Re: {Disarmed} Fwd: Under Attack, my dns servers

[Paul Cartwright]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/06/2014 05:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Oh, hell...  Yeah, AT&T Uverse seriously dicked up everything about a
> year ago with a round of updates to their Cisco model RG's (Residential
> Gateways).  Those gateways do have IPv6 options but are not, in reality,
> IPv6 capable yet.  But they DO block protocol 41 (grrr) which fscks up
> direct tunnels to HE.  There is a solution and you can get IPv6 from
> AT&T over Uverse but you have to really bitch at them and then they'll
> replace your Cisco RG with a Motorolla RG (which sucks WAY less than the
> Cisco POS) and you can get a /60 IPv6 network (that's 16 IPv6 SLA's /
> subnets)...
>
> http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2013-November/062304.html
>
> I had to switch my link over to running protocol 41 (IPv6) over protocol
> 50) ESP / IPsec out to my colo to deal with their dainbramaged crap.
> Can be done.  Can be a royal PITA depending on provider.
>
> Regards,
so when do you think AT&T will provide IPv6 to ALL consumers, meaning
dumping these wonderful 2wire routers.. they will first have to retrain
all their support monkeys to understand IPv6..

- -- 
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUM8I3AAoJEFOC6wwM39g17mwIAM47JfxUfFvRZ+jE/2W3/kOA
w9qnFD+lZCnUZGSmR1q1N6B5Qh979epXTcbBwQYH2kAyy5KOSrUvwdAtt5fgShNb
hk7Tv/NXiZYJawDQiGL7ezMbgH63pb6zwCm33bQglN98L+4dVWG7ts0UG0MEvjmF
qu47L+itmiWat0aMU0oaRTcGN0d+aN1dfUYbAxzhAbg8Iz5LKGIu5+N6f1dlNTDm
FgAC8yGLEjjec1BtLxEpolPFr1A516spov9r3ovh2th3Msk9j8Vg0DS38nCvXJFB
MgsCY8s7pHO6AqpkvjrgCgo+PkOULOVo74ij7xRUa8qq4NpvZjtzDsaUdeeAk+w=
=DRGo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----