[ale] Ale subscribers

[Raylynn Knight]

If you can't keep your intolerant political views out of your posts you're apt to lose even more list participants!

Ray Knight


On Oct 16, 2013, at 10:38 AM, Aaron Ruscetta <arxaaron at gmail.com> wrote:

> Still my opinion that this is a crock of panic driven over-reaction.
> 
> The problem is a valid concern, but the implications seem greatly
> exaggerated and the causes are pure emotional speculation of one
> individual that is seriously lacking in evidence.  The real sources
> of the problem have not been rationally evaluated, so the method of
> addressing it is reactive, extremist and aggressively ignorant.  This
> might fly at a teabagger terrorist rally, but it has no place here.
> 
> The whole discussion is being so inappropriately manipulated that
> I am finding it a huge argument for abandoning ALE and moving
> on myself.  I'll sit with it a few days to cool off and let y'all know.
> 
> in peace,
> aaron
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jim Lynch
> <ale_nospam at fayettedigital.com> wrote:
>> On 10/16/2013 12:11 AM, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
>> 
>> I move to quash the motion.  I think that Jim has done his job quite well,
>> and far better than I could ever have had the patience to do.  He found a
>> compromise solution that involves absolutely zero censorship.  Others called
>> for the targeted moderation of individuals.
>> 
>> Sorry I should have said, I second a motion for quashing.  I agree with
>> Mike.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo