[ale] HomeVPN

[Brian MacLeod]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 11/14/12 6:53 AM, Richard Bronosky wrote:
> If this is for home use, then you probably have only 1 public IP 
> and are using NAT internally. If so, you can publicly host DNS
> that exposes your private IPs (10. or 192.168. etc.) with
> impunity.
> 

That was actually part of my point of concern.  I was guessing that he
might have private address space allocated to his internal network,
but without "knowing" the network the clients are behind, there could
be address overlap, and thus, the packets do not go where you think
they would go.

bnm


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQE4BAEBCAAiBQJQo600Gxhoa3A6Ly9rZXlzZXJ2ZXIudWJ1bnR1LmNvbQAKCRD5
XCJY/q4Y6B29B/9P4kFke6FZLd5NcmUsUd+F6UOxm9sNfBEOpyDnLO7TUbE1gChL
eDFqaGQEk/qM+UEHME9W1bc1Q/noOEQrXWhETt48WORBbknO/ciwsF9G4PcJ66kn
TTHqinRMKugJmfjvLY7ug/lsW8gsp3E/6RUPUyBNbsnuNLDi079hbTv9GTT8jDvl
Z5r7r16sOIo0oV1YmswAKbuWIspq8v2wuZBr6rx2Mg0GNMYpVn/supDzDb8oRBGN
6hq11ow/mttp8GehHueh37q3ocKzL/3jllRALQMqlWVbgZP1alVIHtejgqk4QIg8
z99uF5DlKYh2K5iIxgIs2IwsL/KH8fC83KMi
=wFF4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----