[ale] Help - DEB Pkg Hell

JD jdp at algoloma.com
Mon May 23 09:09:22 EDT 2011


On SunOS, 'man tunefs' had the quote I used.

See ref:
http://miroirs.cesars.org/man/pages/SunOS-4.1.3/man8/tunefs.8.txt

I thought everyone knew this. ;)
This goes to show what is wrong with man pages today. ;)


On 05/23/2011 08:07 AM, Geoffrey Myers wrote:
> JD wrote:
>> CRAP!  You were completely correct! 97% inodes used.
>> Ruby gems suck inodes.
>>
>> $ df -i
>> Filesystem            Inodes   IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
>> /dev/sda1             247504  228703   18801   93% /
>>
>> After cleaning a few files, I was able to clean up some kernel packages
>> too.  On that one box, everything is fine, but the issue on the other
>> machines is definitely different.
>>
>> What's the moral to this story?  On dev systems, you probably do not
>> want the default FS settings.
>>
>> "You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tune a fish."
> 
> I believe the correct quote is:
> 
> You can tune a kernel, but you can't tune a fish..
> :)


More information about the Ale mailing list