[ale] Help - DEB Pkg Hell
JD
jdp at algoloma.com
Mon May 23 09:09:22 EDT 2011
On SunOS, 'man tunefs' had the quote I used.
See ref:
http://miroirs.cesars.org/man/pages/SunOS-4.1.3/man8/tunefs.8.txt
I thought everyone knew this. ;)
This goes to show what is wrong with man pages today. ;)
On 05/23/2011 08:07 AM, Geoffrey Myers wrote:
> JD wrote:
>> CRAP! You were completely correct! 97% inodes used.
>> Ruby gems suck inodes.
>>
>> $ df -i
>> Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
>> /dev/sda1 247504 228703 18801 93% /
>>
>> After cleaning a few files, I was able to clean up some kernel packages
>> too. On that one box, everything is fine, but the issue on the other
>> machines is definitely different.
>>
>> What's the moral to this story? On dev systems, you probably do not
>> want the default FS settings.
>>
>> "You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tune a fish."
>
> I believe the correct quote is:
>
> You can tune a kernel, but you can't tune a fish..
> :)
More information about the Ale
mailing list