[ale] why would it take longer to delete a file than to createit?

Greg Clifton gccfof5 at gmail.com
Thu May 6 13:50:02 EDT 2010


Speaking of RAID arrays, one thing that can compromise performance is having
write caching turned off, which, it is my understanding, should be done for
safety of the data if the RAID controller is not equipped with it's own
battery backup.

GC

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:22 PM, JK <jknapka at kneuro.net> wrote:

> On 5/6/2010 9:39 AM, Jim Kinney wrote:
> > Look through the hdparm variables and see if your drive(s) are in some
> > stupid/slow mode.
>
>
> Begging the question: what counts as "stupid/slow"?  I know that having
> DMA turned off, or set wrong, will kill performance.  What else should
> be checked?
>
> And Google leads me to:
>
> http://www.linuxclues.com/articles/20.htm
>
> In general, PIO modes are slowest and UDMA modes are fastest, correct?
> I remember a while back I had a 160G RAID array that was literally
> taking days to rebuild. Turned out the HDs were in like PIO3 or something.
> Changed to UDMA4 and the rebuild completed in fifteen minutes.
>
> -- JK
>
>
> --
> Forget Jesus: stars died so that you could be here today.
>  - physicist Lawrence Krauss
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20100506/b772e16d/attachment.html 


More information about the Ale mailing list