[ale] [OT] make dsl modem visible?

[Tim Watts]

Nope, the 10's net is just as unreachable. Don't know if this will shed any 
light on things, but here's the router's routing table:

Destination LAN IP  Subnet Mask      Gateway      Interface
66.32.240.1         255.255.255.255  0.0.0.0      WAN (Internet)
192.168.2.0         255.255.255.0    0.0.0.0      LAN & Wireless
0.0.0.0             0.0.0.0          66.32.240.1  WAN (Internet)


On Friday 24 July 2009 4:17:34 pm Richard Bronosky wrote:
> Beat me to it. Ditto this.
>
> On 7/24/09, JK <jknapka at kneuro.net> wrote:
> > Tim Watts wrote:
> >> OK, so on JK's reasonable theory that my linksys is stuck on serving
> >> 192.168.1.0 to lan clients, I reconfigured the modem as 192.168.3.1.
> >> Still no
> >> go. Tried pinging it from the router and workstation -- not reachable.
> >> Tried
> >> adding a static route to that net on the router -- not reachable. It
> >> seems
> >>
> >> that any route I try to add on the router that goes thru the WAN
> >> interface
> >>
> >> gets silently rejected. So I think what Jason mentions is what I'll have
> >> to
> >> do. I'm going to explore dd-wrt vs openwrt.
> >>
> >> Thanks folks!
> >
> > Another issue is that the router might think the LAN has a 16-bit netmask
> > and not a 24-bit one, which would prompt it to send traffic to
> > 192.168.3.1 on the internal (LAN) interface.  Can you change the modem's
> > address to something like 10.0.0.2/8?  Or change the subnet on the LAN
> > side of the router (in the router configuration)?
> >
> > -- JK
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

-- 
One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that 
one's work is terribly important.
 -- Bertrand Russell