[ale] VPN Protocol Question

[Richard Bronosky]

I think Free VPN solutions would be a great presentation topic!

.!# RichardBronosky #!.



On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Kenneth Ratliff <lists at noctum.net> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
> The use of NAT does not automatically rule out IPSec, but the use of
>
> pfSense does. pfSense doesn't support NAT-T (NAT Transversal, which is
>
> basically just encapsulating the IPSec packet in a UDP packet), unless
>
> that's changed recently.
>
> This would seem to indicate that pfSense supports NAT-T as of 1.3
>
> http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=211
>
> Hrm, I need to take another look at pfSense then. The lack of NAT-T was the
> one thing that made me dismiss it the last time I looked at it.
> Thanks for the heads up!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>