[ale] VPN Protocol Question

[Kenneth Ratliff]

On Apr 16, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>> The use of NAT does not automatically rule out IPSec, but the use of
>> pfSense does. pfSense doesn't support NAT-T (NAT Transversal, which  
>> is
>> basically just encapsulating the IPSec packet in a UDP packet),  
>> unless
>> that's changed recently.
>
> 	This would seem to indicate that pfSense supports NAT-T as of 1.3
>
> 	http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=211


Hrm, I need to take another look at pfSense then. The lack of NAT-T  
was the one thing that made me dismiss it the last time I looked at it.

Thanks for the heads up!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20090416/1c80ff79/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20090416/1c80ff79/attachment.bin