[ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real

[Warren Myers]

wait a second, are you trying to stack Girlfriend 10.0 on top of Wife
2.0with Wife_Friend
5.0 acting as a process monitor?

On 4/13/07, Scott Castaline <hscast at charter.net> wrote:
>
> Jeff Lightner wrote:
> > My point was that in global systems it is always possible you'll end up
> > with an interlink you didn't anticipate.  If for example Wife's_Friend
> > 3.0 is temporarily established in Restaurant 5.0 at the same time as
> > Girlfriend 10.0 is established there along with Husband 1.0 the
> > consequences can be disastrous.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Lane
> > Oden
> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 2:09 PM
> > To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> > Subject: Re: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
> >
> > But you can isolate Wife 2.0 and Girlfriend 10.0 by running them on
> > separate systems. It's important to keep Wife 2.0 and Girlfriend 10.0
> > physically and logically separate. It is not recommended to run these
> > two applications in a chroot jail. Proper security boundaries must be
> > implemented to avoid crosstalk. Girlfriend 10.0 is often accepting of
> > the Wife 2.0 instance, however rarely is it the case that the opposite
> > is true.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Jeff
> > Lightner
> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:47 PM
> > To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> > Subject: Re: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
> >
> >
> > You think Wife 2.0 has issues with that - see what happens if you try to
> > install Girlfriend 10.0 in the same system or even in a different system
> > on a different lan - eventually some interlink will cause you problems.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Dan
> > Lambert
> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:11 PM
> > To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> > Subject: Re: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 13:02 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> >> On 4/13/07, Dan Lambert <danlambert at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 12:12 -0400, Jeff Lightner wrote:
> >>>> I certainly know the difference between Kovacs and Caesar.   For
> > some
> >>>> reason I associate Imogene with Kovacs but right after I'd sent
> > the
> >>>> email I had noticed she didn't appear in the link I sent so did
> > some
> >>>> Googling and didn't find anything that associates them together.
> >>>> Apparently the pointers in my memory structures had a single bit
> > parity
> >>>> issue.   Despite that I won't panic...
> >>> ----- el snippo-----
> >>>
> >>> I've been having parity issues with the installed RAM for years,
> > Jeff.
> >>> Sometimes it's magic, and sometimes it ain't.
> >>>
> >>> Not to worry a simple reboot brings things back for a little bit. At
> >
> >>> least until someone asks a question that I have to do a DB search
> > on.
> >>> Dan
> >> I'm not sure it helps, but rinsing my internal CPU in alcohol is part
> >> of my routine maintenance.
> >>
> >> Greg
> >
> > I've found that good Irish Ales and Stouts have the desired effects, but
> > I can't keep the RAM awash in those substances continuously, or Wife 2.0
> > tends to start having issues with my OS.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >
> >
> >
> > The information transmitted is the property of NCP Solutions and is
> > intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
> > contain confidential,
> > proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
> > dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon
> > this information by
> > persons or entities, other than the intended recipient, is prohibited.
> > If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> > material from all computers.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >
> Can you stack virtual machines on each other? Host 1 runs Linux, Guest 1
> runs whatever is now Host 2, Guest 2 runs whatever on top of Host 2 and
> becomes Host 3 etc, etc then create a 2nd similar stack of VMs. Use 2
> USB Mon/Kybd/Mouse combos one for wife 2.0 on one VM stack and
> Girlfriend 10.0 on 2nd VM stack. Of course they would be in separate
> rooms unbeknown st to each other. I don't know it seems like a good idea
> and was clear after about 8 Guiness or was it 10 , maybe
> 13,,,,,,,,,,,,,thump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>



-- 
http://warrenmyers.com
"God may not play dice with the universe, but something strange is going on
with the prime numbers." --Paul Erd?s
"It's not possible. We are the type of people who have everything in our
favor going against us." --Ben Jarhvi, Short Circuit 2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...