[ale] [On-topic] "wa" number in "top"?
Jeff Lightner
jlightner at water.com
Thu Oct 5 10:21:41 EDT 2006
pmap -x works fine on my FC4 system. Maybe running a "yum update
procps" would get you a better version of pmap? The version on mine
is:
procps-3.2.5-6.4
Perhaps doing a cat of /proc/<pid>/maps will give you the info you need?
-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Jim
To: ale at ale.org
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 9:52 AM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] [On-topic] "wa" number in "top"?
Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> On init, pmap shows:
>
> fd0man at pepper:~[0]$ pmap 1
> 1: init [2]
> 08048000 28K r-x-- /sbin/init
> 0804f000 4K rwx-- /sbin/init
> 08050000 132K rwx-- [ anon ]
> b7dee000 4K rwx-- [ anon ]
> b7def000 1172K r-x-- /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.3.6.so
> b7f14000 28K rwx-- /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.3.6.so
> b7f1b000 12K rwx-- [ anon ]
> b7f29000 12K rwx-- [ anon ]
> b7f2c000 84K r-x-- /lib/ld-2.3.6.so
> b7f41000 4K rwx-- /lib/ld-2.3.6.so
> bfa2b000 88K rw--- [ stack ]
> ffffe000 4K ----- [ anon ]
> total 1572K
> fd0man at pepper:~[0]$
>
>
On a fc4 system pmap displays nothing. I tried pmap -x on a bunch of
pids but it doesn't seem to work. Any idea why?
Thanks,
Jim.
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
More information about the Ale
mailing list