[ale] [On-topic] "wa" number in "top"?

Jeff Lightner jlightner at water.com
Thu Oct 5 10:21:41 EDT 2006


pmap -x works fine on my FC4 system.   Maybe running a "yum update
procps" would get you a better version of pmap?   The version on mine
is:
procps-3.2.5-6.4

Perhaps doing a cat of /proc/<pid>/maps will give you the info you need?

-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Jim
To: ale at ale.org
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 9:52 AM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] [On-topic] "wa" number in "top"?

Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> On init, pmap shows:
>
> fd0man at pepper:~[0]$ pmap 1
> 1:   init [2]
> 08048000     28K r-x--  /sbin/init
> 0804f000      4K rwx--  /sbin/init
> 08050000    132K rwx--    [ anon ]
> b7dee000      4K rwx--    [ anon ]
> b7def000   1172K r-x--  /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.3.6.so
> b7f14000     28K rwx--  /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.3.6.so
> b7f1b000     12K rwx--    [ anon ]
> b7f29000     12K rwx--    [ anon ]
> b7f2c000     84K r-x--  /lib/ld-2.3.6.so
> b7f41000      4K rwx--  /lib/ld-2.3.6.so
> bfa2b000     88K rw---    [ stack ]
> ffffe000      4K -----    [ anon ]
>  total     1572K
> fd0man at pepper:~[0]$
>
>   

On a fc4 system pmap displays nothing.  I tried pmap -x on a bunch of 
pids but it doesn't seem to work.  Any idea why?

Thanks,
Jim.
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale



More information about the Ale mailing list