[ale] hack attempts

[James Baldwin]

On 11 Feb 2005, at 19:31, James Baldwin wrote:

> IPv6 is not unscanable. Rather it is inefficient to scan random IPs 
> looking for vulnerable hosts. The address range for IPv6 is that 
> enormous. This could change if the address space fills up 
> sufficiently, or other better manners of scanning hosts are discovered 
> but that is unlikely in the near term. Hopefully by the time this 
> happens there will be better anomaly at the edges so the provider 
> would detect a scan.

s/manners/means
s/anomaly/anomaly detection

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part