[ale] failover planning
Bob Toxen
bob at verysecurelinux.com
Mon Nov 29 20:29:49 EST 2004
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 07:49:43PM -0500, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> Speaking of failover is it possible to install 2 NICS in Linux and put
> them on the same subnet. I.E. eth0 = 192.168.1.4 and eth1 = 192.168.1.5
> then place those NICS under load balancing. In this case both will have
> the same DNS and same gateway. All load balancing setups I've seen load
> balance between multiple Internet connections.
Sure. No problem. Of course, this is needed only if your total bandwidth
requirements exceed that of a single NIC (either 100 Mbps duplex or 1 Gbps).
Bob Toxen
bob at verysecurelinux.com [Please use for email to me]
http://www.verysecurelinux.com [Network&Linux/Unix security consulting]
http://www.realworldlinuxsecurity.com [My book:"Real World Linux Security 2/e"]
Quality Linux & UNIX security and SysAdmin & software consulting since 1990.
"Microsoft: Unsafe at any clock speed!"
-- Bob Toxen 10/03/2002
> On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 19:40, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:51:34 -0500, James P. Kinney III
> > <jkinney at localnetsolutions.com> wrote:
> > > I am looking at setting up a small non-local redundant webserver. The
> > > net access for each node is through different ISP's so each node has
> > > different IP's. In fact, there is nothing in common between the two
> > > different networks. They have no common router.
> > >
> > > The main site is serverd by a T1 line that is susceptable to an outage
> > > caused by falling trees. I would like to make the outage as short as
> > > possible by making the backup site live as fast as possible. Right now,
> > > other than editing the DNS listing and waiting for the change to
> > > propogate, I have no other way to do this.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions?
> > > --
> > > James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
> >
> > If nothing else, you could try round-robin DNS.
> >
> > That way roughly half of your dns quiries will go to each IP.
> >
> > Then set your client TTL low so your users are requesting a new DNS
> > entry fairly often.
> >
> > If one of your sites fails, there is a 50% chance your users will go
> > to the other site with their next DNS request. (ie. if you have M$
> > users, they do a dns request at least once per reboot.)
> >
> > Greg
More information about the Ale
mailing list