[ale] Its over. Maybe

[Jim Popovitch]

On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 18:57 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:

> I'm not suggesting that there should be 10 vendors building voting 
> machines, what I'm suggesting is that all electronic voting machines 
> should be reviewed by someone other than parties who have a vested 
> interest in said company.  You can attack a monopoly on either axis.

But that has happened and you are still not satisfied.  Earlier you left
the impression that in order to be satisfied YOU had to see the source
code too.  There is no end to this sort of issue if you can't clearly
define what it takes to qualify. 

-Jim P.