[ale] renaming the group

[Geoffrey]

Marvin Dickens wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2003 20:31:45 -0500 "James P. Kinney III"
> <jkinney at localnetsolutions.com> wrote the following:
> 
> 
>> It looks like we may need to rename the group as it is growing 
>> geographically
> 
> 
> 
> MHO is that renaming the group is a mistake. Why not have divisions
> or (For the lack of a better term) chapters? This way we retain the
> name ALE and we avoid confusion (Which would certainly happen). Plus,
> it lets all of the other Linux Users Groups know that we are growing.

I say stick with the name.  After all, AT&T is still AT&T, even though 
it no longer stands for American Telephone and Telegraph...

> 
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> 
> Marvin Dickens _______________________________________________ Ale
> mailing list Ale at ale.org http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> 

-- 
Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric at 3times25.net

The latest, most widespread virus?  Microsoft end user agreement.
Think about it...

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale