[ale] k7s5a motherboard
Geoffrey
esoteric at 3times25.net
Mon Oct 21 15:51:23 EDT 2002
Dow Hurst wrote:
> You should feel that 13 degree difference if the heatsink was that warm,
> however, the CPU thermocouple is in the CPU not the heatsink so is
> misleading to interpret that temp as the heatsink temp. The mass and
> temp difference between the CPU and the heatsink is considerable so your
> energy is dissipated by raising the temp of the heatsink by a small
> amount. I haven't measured the current temp on the CPU of my Athlon
> XP1800 but will this evening. I know my top temp on the CPU was 65 C
> and the the current temp with original heatsink was about 55-58C. That
> was all BIOS based info. I do know that AMD had on their site a PDF of
> how to build a case for proper airflow in their support section.
Sounds like an explanation from a Chemist, oh, wait.... :) I could tell
it was a bit warm relative to my skin, thus I suspect the temp value is
accurate.
Since
> your BIOS is wanting to shut off the CPU at 45C you might need to see
> about upping that value instead of trying to cool the CPU more. You
> might be at the normal running temp and the BIOS has too low a value for
> the shutdown temp.
Actually, all the bios is doing is listing the temp, it doesn't have a
shutoff value, sofar as I can tell, that is. My Asus board did. This
one, when you go to 'system monitor' just lists the current values.
The upper end I've got of 45C came from a web site put together by
someone who has the same board as well as the example docs that came
with lm_sensors. There was a specific entry in there for this chipset,
therefore I assumed it was correct. I've searched all over the amd site
but was unable to locate any specific temp info.
I also looked for quiet PCs and suppliers of parts.
> Got good info on fan dB numbers. Anything under 32dB is considered very
> quiet. One large quiet fan pulling air out of the case can it some
> instances be the best config. A fan directly on top of the case instead
> of the back can be very good. The Zalman fan has an adjustable RPM so
> you can get it down to 26dB. Then a high quality low noise certified
> powersupply with the double fan input/exit format will pull the air out
> of the case vertically and push it out the back. A fan pulling air into
> the case can overpressure the case and cause improper airflow patterns.
> I'd love to study this more since Dell has optimized their fan/case
> design to create a incredibly silent computer with enough airflow to
> keep the CPU cool.
Yeah, originally I had a single fan in the front/lower pulling air in
and then relied on the PS fan at the top to send it out again. I added
another fan on the back pulling air out right below the ps. I was then
concerned with too much pull out and not enough pull in. This can cause
your power supply to overheat because it's not getting the airflow it
did before I added the other fan. That's why I thought about adding
another 'in' fan then I'd have two in two out. Of course size rpm and
stuff of the fans all matter as well.
>
> What is your CPU?
xp 1700
>
> I have a video card fan, which was a loud fan for it's size, a chipset
> fan, a CPU fan, and two fans in the power supply. Since I got a 300
> watt dual fan powersupply that wasn't low noise certified, it is the
> loudest fan noise coming from the case. It is a better quality
> powersupply so isn't obnoxious. The Zalman CPU fan is totally silent
> along with the chipset fan. The video card fan died so I removed it and
> readjusted the Zalman fan to cover both the CPU and video card. Works
> just fine. I'll get you some numbers tonight.
Thanks. I'm not so much concerned with the noise as I am the temp.
This machine sits on the other side of a wall, so the sound is minimal.
I will eventually sound proof that wall, since it separates my office
from 7 computers, a furnace and the hot water heater. :)
> Dow
>
>
> Geoffrey wrote:
>
>> Just out of curiosity, my expectation is that if the cpu is running
>> 45C (~112F), that the heat sink would be pretty warm to the touch, but
>> that does not appear to be the case. Maybe not, since 112F isn't but
>> a few degrees above body temperature. Maybe I've got my upper limit
>> wrong?? Input??
>>
>
--
Until later: Geoffrey esoteric at 3times25.net
I didn't have to buy my radio from a specific company to listen
to FM, why doesn't that apply to the Internet (anymore...)?
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list