[ale] [OT] congress vote history
Irv Mullins
irvm at ellijay.com
Fri Oct 18 16:24:30 EDT 2002
It's not at all stupid - if you're a politician who doesn't want your
constituents to know how you voted. Better, it lets them lie about
how they voted to suit the occasion.
Friends of the Earth meeting? "I voted to prohibit logging...."
Lumbermen's Association meeting: "I voted to support logging..."
Irv
On Friday 18 October 2002 04:00 pm, Swantje Willms wrote:
> This seems like a pretty stupid way of doing things. Those with the louder
> voices win?
>
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, SanMillan, Todd wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > "During a VOICE VOTE, members say 'aye' aloud as a group, followed by the
> > group saying 'no.' The presiding officer decides which group prevailed
> > and announces the result. No names are recorded "
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list