[ale] Bandwidth aggregation?
Taylor Robison
trobis at speakeasy.net
Fri Jul 26 15:21:55 EDT 2002
I have no personal experience to share but I remembered this slashdot
review from a while back.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/06/30/1850236
Its a $400 router/switch that can take two "boradband" inputs and
loadbalance between them.
Maybe this could be a way to use both lines without a lot of
config/support issues.
Taylor
Trey Darley wrote:
>Hey, y'all. I've been lurking for a while, but finally I have a problem to
>throw out there for discussion.
>Here's the situation: I want to aggregate the bandwidth of two dsls. I
>don't know if this could be done with some kind of round-robin routing
>(for lack of knowing what else to call what I have in mind.) Another
>alternative is to isolate specific types of traffic to one pipe or the
>other - keeping interactive flowing smoothly is always nice. My client
>presently has these two dsls for redundancy - smart - but one is just
>sitting idle. Is there any better way of automating a failover than by
>just writing crontabbing some scripts that check and take action
>accordingly?
>I guess the real question is how the return path would work... unless a
>particular session had the same origin, it seems things would get fubared.
>PPP Multilink Protocol?? The RFC looked vaguely promising.
>Just for the record, I *did* google and deja this. Also re-read the
>advanced routing howto (which is a bit incomplete). Any of y'all done
>something similar to this?
>
>Thanks!
>
>--Trey
>
>P.S. To everyone who bought hardware off of me prior to my Great Central
>European Escape, thanks! You guys rock! What more can I say in praise of
>ALE but that y'all paid my rent in Prague for a couple of months?! :-)
>
>+++--------------------------------------------------------------+++
>
>Trey Darley
>System Administrator / Network Engineer
>AIS Computers
>165 Carnegie PLace
>Fayetteville, GA 30214
>Work: 770.461.2147, ext. 128
>Mobile: 404.455.1516
>
>[Please note that the opinions I express are not to be in any way
>construed as those of AIS, unless that is expressly stated.]
>
>+++--------------------------------------------------------------+++
>
>
>
>
>---
>This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
>See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
>sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
>
>
>
>
>
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list