[ale] suggested kernel?

Chris Fowler cfowler at outpostsentinel.com
Tue Feb 19 15:12:13 EST 2002


And if you upgrade your kernel and forget to upgrade your modules you're
screwed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Cox [mailto:danscox at mindspring.com]
To: ale at ale.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:24 PM
To: Geoffrey
Cc: ALE Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ale] suggested kernel?


On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 14:38, Geoffrey wrote:
> Modules loaded in and out take/reduce memory foot prints when the
> modules are not loaded.

	Also, modules go into *different memory* than kernel memory.  When
accessing them, they take a little longer just to run, due to page
faults.  I've seen estimates of up to 5%, depending on the kernel hacker
you're speaking with.

	Modules do take up a bit more memory than the compiled in versions.
So, if you're always gonna use X, then compile it in.

	On the other hand, if you're a distributor like RedHat, then you want
your shipping kernel to work everywhere.  So, you make everything you
can a module.  It Just Works!

--
kernel, n.: A part of an operating system that preserves the
medieval traditions of sorcery and black art.

Danny


---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.




---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.






More information about the Ale mailing list