[ale] Netscape/Mozilla

[James Taylor]

There was prefs.js file setting that could be used with 4.7x to allow
that.  You had to do install Navigator only.  If you included
Communicator in the install it would work.

Does this not work with Mozilla?  I haven't tried it lately.

-jt

James Taylor
The East Cobb Group,Inc
678-560-9702
james.taylor at eastcobbgroup.com

>>> "Christopher R. Curzio" <ale at accipiter.org> 08/12/02 08:41PM >>>
I'm still waiting for a fairly easy way to make Mozilla use an
external
mail client. Mozilla mail is still a lot slower than I'd like, and I
like
Sylpheed too much to just toss it out. 

Anyone know if this is coming down the devel pipes anytimes soon?

-- 
Christopher R. Curzio     |  Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax
http://www.accipiter.org  |  si marmota monax materiam possit
materiari?
:wq!


Thus Spake Dow Hurst <dhurst at kennesaw.edu>:
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:31:42 -0400


> For those who require the Sent folder to be sorted by Sender instead
of 
> Recipient, the 1.1a or 1.1b versions of Mozilla are a necessity since

> that is where that patch was finally applied.  I have been using 1.1a

> for about two months, I think, and really love it.  I would highly 
> recommend going to the latest version.  You can have subfolders of
the 
> Sent folder as well that are sorted like the old Communicator 4.x 
> series.  However the only folder that sent mail will go into is the 
> actual Sent folder.  You can't have a subfolder of the Sent folder
where
> 
> currently sent mail is stored.  I name my Sent folder subfolders by 
> ranges of dates so I know generally where a email I sent is by the
era 
> of time I was working on a project.  Usually works.
> Dow
> 
> 
> Geoffrey wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Steven A. DuChene wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 09:00:35PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
> >>
> >>> I had tried Mozilla a number of times over the past year.  It was

> >>> always too slow, inparticular the mail tool.  I then tried 0.9.8
and
> >
> >>> the speed difference in the mail tool was enough that I've been 
> >>> using it since.
> >>>
> >>> I've not gone to 1.0 yet, lazy I guess...  Guess I'll go check it

> >>> out. :)
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> You should try the latest 1.1b stuff instead of the 1.0 branch.
> >
> >
> > Thanks, noting that I finished installing 1.0 and all the plugins 
> > about 1 hour before your message. :(  So is there substantial 
> > difference?  My biggest complaint is they still don't have spell
> > check.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---
> This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems
> should be sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
> 

---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems
should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.


---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.