[ale] next stupid ipchains question

Wandered Inn esoteric at atlnet.com
Thu Sep 7 17:15:19 EDT 2000


Charles Marcus wrote:
> 
> OK, guess it's time to go back and review TCP/IP.
> 
> Sorry for the display of ignorance.

Hey, you've got a long way to catch up on my on displaying ignorance.
:)  You had me going back to the book to verify, so I wasn't all to sure
either.  That's just one of those kind of things I would overlook.

> 
> -----------
> 
> Charles
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: esoteric at denali.atlnet.com
> [mailto:esoteric at denali.atlnet.com]On
> > Behalf Of Wandered Inn
> > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 4:01 PM
> > To: Charles Marcus
> > Cc: ale at ale.org
> > Subject: Re: [ale] next stupid ipchains question
> >
> >
> > Charles Marcus wrote:
> > >
> > > > > eth0 -> 192.168.255.0
> > > > > eth1 -> 192.168.10.0
> > >
> > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but 192.168.255.0 is not a
> valid
> > > subnet/IP address, is it?
> >
> > private class C networks run from 192.168.0.0 through
> > 192.168.255.0 per
> > 'Linux network admin. guide.'
> >
> > >
> > > Charles
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe
> > ale" in message body.
> >
> > --
> > Until later: Geoffrey         esoteric at denali.atlnet.com
> >
> > Microsoft != Innovation
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.

--
Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric at denali.atlnet.com

Microsoft != Innovation
--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.





More information about the Ale mailing list