[ale] next stupid ipchains question

[Charles Marcus]

OK, guess it's time to go back and review TCP/IP.

Sorry for the display of ignorance.

-----------

Charles


> -----Original Message-----
> From: esoteric at denali.atlnet.com
[mailto:esoteric at denali.atlnet.com]On
> Behalf Of Wandered Inn
> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 4:01 PM
> To: Charles Marcus
> Cc: ale at ale.org
> Subject: Re: [ale] next stupid ipchains question
>
>
> Charles Marcus wrote:
> >
> > > > eth0 -> 192.168.255.0
> > > > eth1 -> 192.168.10.0
> >
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but 192.168.255.0 is not a
valid
> > subnet/IP address, is it?
>
> private class C networks run from 192.168.0.0 through
> 192.168.255.0 per
> 'Linux network admin. guide.'
>
> >
> > Charles
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe
> ale" in message body.
>
> --
> Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric at denali.atlnet.com
>
> Microsoft != Innovation
>

--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.