[ale] RedHat 6.0

[Christopher S. Adams]

in general
i've been using linux since 2.0.27
and FreeBSD since 2.2-RELENG and 3.0 was in snaps
i have only minimal experience with NT though

if you're interested, you can email me privately or call me at:
770-505-1564

Chris

-----Original Message-----
 From: Patrick Ramsey <Ramsey_Patrick at promina.org>
To: toiletduk at penguinpowered.com <toiletduk at penguinpowered.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 25, 1999 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ale] RedHat 6.0


Does it have to be linux?  Or are you looking to get into the IT world in
general?

>>> "Christopher S. Adams" <toiletduk at penguinpowered.com> 05/25 12:42 AM >>>
i'd like to add that i found the iso on ga tech's ftp
i'll notify you when i finish (this'll take a while at 28.8, but i want it
too, dammit :)

i'd also like to add that if anybody has a linux related job opening (not
programming), i'd be happy to know.  school will be out soon and i'd like to
get in the loop.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
 From: Christopher S. Adams <toiletduk at penguinpowered.com>
To: ale at ale.org <ale at ale.org>
Date: Monday, May 24, 1999 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [ale] RedHat 6.0


>just point me to the iso and i'll burn you a copy :)
>
>Chris
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom <tom at watson.st>
>To: Christopher S. Adams <toiletduk at penguinpowered.com>
>Cc: ale at ale.org <ale at ale.org>
>Date: Monday, May 24, 1999 6:30 PM
>Subject: Re: [ale] RedHat 6.0
>
>
>>I downloaded a copy of CDRWin and have been trying to burn a copy of the
>>.iso onto a CDR. It may be that my copy of the .iso is bad, but I now have
>>three CDR that make really good coasters (I think).
>>How do you burn an ISO9660 image of a linux .iso with CDRWin under with a
>>windows platform?
>>
>>Tom
>>
>>
>>At 10:35 PM 5/19/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>>easy cd creator's iso burning capability is not the greatest
>>>
>>>you should get ez cd pro or cdrwin
>>>
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey at switchco.com>
>>>To: ale at ale.org <ale at ale.org>
>>>Cc: Tom <tom at watson.st>
>>>Date: Wednesday, May 19, 1999 10:00 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [ale] RedHat 6.0
>>>
>>>
>>> >The .iso file is an ISO9660 cdrom image. Under Linux, utilizing the
>>> >local loop, you can actually mount this file as a virtual disk. In
fact,
>>> >I very much recommend that you do this before burning the cd because if
>>> >you can't mount the file then your image is bad and you'll waste a cd
>>> >(like I did the first time). Your CD writing software (I have Adaptec
>>> >Easy CD Creator on Windows NT) should have the ability to write a CD
>>> >from an image file (which is what this is). That's how you should write
>>> >the disk. Just writing the file to a CD-ROM will only result in copying
>>> >a file and give you nothing except a backup of that file. Once you've
>>> >written the CD from the image file the CD-ROM will then have the full
>>> >directory structure and files in place as you'd expect and you're off
>>> >and running...
>>> >
>>> > Good luck & later,
>>> >
>>> > Ben Scherrey
>>> >
>>> >PS: I was not, unfortunately, able to successfully d/l the .iso image
>>> >from Ga Tech. I assume that's because I was only able to access via
http
>>> >and not ftp which is more efficient and probably safer. Several times
my
>>> >d/l (over 128K ISDN) was aborted for no reason and I had to restart.
>>> >
>>> >Tom wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I know I asked this question before, but my hard disk crashed (don't
>buy
>>> >> hard disks from Best Buys, but that is another
>>> >> story) and I lost all the previous emails. I downloaded RH 6.0 from
>the
>>> >> gatech ftp site (twice) and burned a CD on a windows
>>> >> based machine. I have a Sony CDR that came with a "Hot Burn" CD
writer
>>> >> package. When I create a CDR with the copy
>>> >> file to disk, I am not able to boot with the disk or create a boot
>disk
>>> >> from the .iso file.
>>> >> Do I need to unpack or process the .iso somehow?
>>> >> Is a direct copy?
>>> >> Is a Linux OS the only thing that can read the .iso? (I have Linux
5.2
>>>but
>>> >> was going to start with 6.0 instead)
>>
>