[ale] rpm architecture
Mike Fletcher
fletch at phydeaux.org
Thu Dec 9 09:44:34 EST 1999
>>>>> "Wandered" == Wandered Inn <esoteric at denali.atlnet.com> writes:
Wandered> Question is, I read somewhere that the standard rpms are
Wandered> compiled for a 386 architecture and that if you compile
Wandered> for, say a 586, you may recognize up to a 30% increase
Wandered> in speed. Has anyone recognized such gains? I
[...]
Nothing concrete, but when I switched to a 686-optimized X
server rpm on my pII 400 at work there seemed to be a noticeable
increase in how fast X seemed to run (windows moving faster, shading
faster, ...). May just have been me, but it did seem (for lack of a
better term) much peppier. YMMV, of course. You probably could use
time(1) and repeat the same task using -M 386 compiled binary vs a
-M [56]86 binary on the same box under the same load to get some sort
of actual numbers.
--
Fletch | "If you find my answers frightening, __`'/|
fletch at phydeaux.org | Vincent, you should cease askin' \ o.O'
678 443-6239(w) | scary questions." -- Jules =(___)=
| U
More information about the Ale
mailing list