[ale] doh! stupid glibc..

[Elijah Underwood]

Matt Shade wrote:

> Whoa! Did I miss a posting?

...

Sorry! It was my typo. Where it says "libc.so." in the first line below it
should read "libc.so.6".

> Elijah Underwood wrote:
> >
> > Okay, so we've established that libc.so. is a feindish creation of
> > redhat and thier glibc switcheroo. Now my question is, what do I need to
> > do to get SuSE 5.2 to the point where it'll handle glibc? Is there a
> > glibc-upgrade rpm?