[ale] Systemd rants (was bow head)

[Solomon Peachy]

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 05:53:47AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> > So, why is this point relevant?  It's simple -- you seem to be 
> > completely incapable of grasping the essential premise for systemd; 
> > Namely that traditional init is _too_ simple for the demands of
> > modern systems.  
> 
> Says you. The preceding sentence is your opinion. That does not make 
> it a fact.

Not I -- The systemd authors.  Or are you seriously asserting that the 
folks who wrote systemd are actively lying about why they wrote (and 
use, because they eat their own dogfood) it?

You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts -- And as 
you just aptly pointed out, those words are not synonmous.

Cheers,

 - Solomon
-- 
Solomon Peachy			       pizza at shaftnet dot org
Coconut Creek, FL                          ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20170919/01046175/attachment.sig>