[ale] Why Run your own email server?
Dustin Priest
dustin.h.strickland at gmail.com
Thu Sep 29 13:41:42 EDT 2016
Speaking of SSL and mail transmission... Anyone here tried running
Darkmail yet? It's coming from Ladar Levison of Lavabit and, according
to the specifications, does end-to-end encryption that includes
metadata. Supposedly it's "back" compatible with SMTP as well. I've not
looked at it in a while but it caught my interest after all the legal
drama surrounding Lavabit and the Snowden leaks.
On 9/29/2016 1:21 PM, George P. Burdell wrote:
> Anybody who has actually run their own mail servers for a while knows
> how much of a tremendous chore it is just to keep your mail from being
> blacklisted. Most major providers will, if one person acts up in
> your datacenter and you're not at some enormous facility with a name
> brand, simply ban the entire netblock. They don't care about
> collateral damage. I even get mail server admins who block my Google
> Business email ... and that's a PAYING space, and ergo one of the
> least polluted netblocks for spam on the entire internet.
>
> Oh yea, you can still do your own mail server. But why on Earth would
> you want to? How much money is your time worth? How valuable are
> your emails? How much does it cost you if an important one doesn't
> make it? And I say that as a card carrying member of the EFF who has
> more than a passing distaste for the surveillance state we have
> become. The NSA didn't kill private email servers ... spam did.
>
> It also doesn't help that pretty much every stand alone mail client is
> varying degrees of unsatisfactory (at least for my multi-account
> needs). Opera Mail was PERFECT. And they killed it.
>
> And we'll assume for the sake of argument that spam filtering isn't a
> problem and there are tremendous mail clients available. That
> doesn't fix that the overwhelming majority of email traffic goes over
> in clear text, and the NSA will almost certainly see and record it in
> transit with their strategy of putting snooping stations just upstream
> (up-pipe?) from major people of interest like Google. If one day all
> email is traversing over SSL, Alex's idea will be the simplest way to
> defend your privacy without signing up for the headache of running
> your own mail server.
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Alex Carver
> <agcarver+ale at acarver.net <mailto:agcarver+ale at acarver.net>> wrote:
>
> On 2016-09-29 02:30, DJ-Pfulio wrote:
> > Even client/lawyer communications aren't safe from DHS prying:
> >
> >
> http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/dr20160927-feds-we-can-read-all-your-email-and-you-ll-never-know
> <http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/dr20160927-feds-we-can-read-all-your-email-and-you-ll-never-know>
>
> Yes, this is why I run my own server and download my free email
> services
> (gmail, etc.) to my local hard drive on a regular basis (deleting the
> server side copies after download).
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org <mailto:Ale at ale.org>
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> <http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale>
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
> <http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20160929/4fe33d30/attachment.html>
More information about the Ale
mailing list