[ale] Linux Foundation quietly drops community representation

Jim Kinney jim.kinney at gmail.com
Thu Jan 21 16:37:56 EST 2016


While the original gummiboot sources are gone, the code still exists
but was merged into everyone's favorite tool: systemd
https://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Gummiboot-Is-Dead
So Linux systems still have a EUFI boot tool but it's part of systemd
as SD-boot. Looks like the entire code base was dumped in and renamed
SD-boot. The original author worked on both projects.
I have not used it nor have I poked at it.
ArchLinux has more info on  using it
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd-boot
Sort of like when serial mice were dropped from the kernel. 
On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 16:23 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:26:39 -0600
> Preston <preston.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Very disappointed with this:
> > 
> > "Up until recently, the Linux Foundation allowed the individual
> > members to elect two board members and ensure that the voice of
> > Linux
> > community is considered at the board meetings. In a shocking
> > change,
> > the Foundation has erased this clause and decided to benefit the
> > corporate companies rather that whole community."
> > 
> > 
> > http://fossbytes.com/why-linux-foundations-latest-change-is-a-bad-n
> > ew-for-open-source/
> > 
> > Preston
> 
> This surprises me not one bit. Linux Foundation is organized for big
> corporations, not for the unpaid developers and non-corporate users
> who
> built Linux in the first place. Here's a quote from Wikipedia:
> 
> ============================================================
> Its funding comes primarily from its Platinum Members: Fujitsu, HP,
> IBM, Intel, NEC, Oracle, Qualcomm, and Samsung and for many years
> Hitachi.[23] These nine each having a representative on the Board of
> Directors, they hold a majority on the 16-person board.[24]
> ============================================================
> 
> What I find quite scary about this is that the Linux Foundation
> possesses one of the few all-distro methods to boot with Secure Boot.
> The microsecond their major contributors decide an all-distro method
> to
> boot Secure Boot is contrary to their bottom line, none of us have an
> all-distro method, unless we find the last version, and fork it.
> 
> According to gummiboot Wikipedia page
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gummiboot_(software) :
> 
> =============================================================
> In May 2015, gummiboot was fully integrated into systemd to form its
> systemd-boot component that serves as a UEFI boot manager.[2][3]
> Following this action, the source code repository of gummiboot was
> emptied out in July 2015.
> =============================================================
> 
> "The source code repository of gummiboot was emptied out in July
> 2015."
> 
> Makes it just a little harder to fork, doesn't it?
> 
> From where I stand, corporate Linux will foreclose user choice if
> such
> foreclosure enhances the corporation's bottom line.
> 
> Unless you own or are paid by a big corporation, Linux Foundation is
> not your friend.
> 
> SteveT
> 
> Steve Litt 
> January 2016 featured book: Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/28
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
-- 
James P. Kinney III

Every time you stop a school, you will have to build a jail. What you
gain at one end you lose at the other. It's like feeding a dog on his
own tail. It won't fatten the dog.
- Speech 11/23/1900 Mark Twain

http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20160121/8848093a/attachment.html>


More information about the Ale mailing list