[ale] RH Satellite 6 moron's intro?

JD jdp at algoloma.com
Thu Jan 22 14:46:07 EST 2015


Isn't it worth having this discussion with Redhat?
Or perhaps on their Atlanta meetup group?

After all, having someone to complain at is part of the reason for paid support.



On 01/22/2015 10:05 AM, James Sumners wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Scott McBrien <smcbrien at gmail.com
> <mailto:smcbrien at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Look, a satellite subscription, like RHEL, is for any version.  You could
>     install Satellite 5 and have a much smoother install experience, user
>     experience, and copious, well written and updated documentation.  In fact,
>     Red Hat just released another dot update to satellite 5.  However, you chose
>     the new hotness, and with that choice comes all the stuff you're complaining
>     about.
> 
> 
> My in production version _is_ 5.x. And you're right, the license is for any
> version of the product. But it's not for infinite instances. There is a 1-year
> transition license, and it's a helluva lot easier to start such a thing at the
> beginning of the year instead of the middle (i.e. I know I  need to be
> transitioned by January of next year without having to consult a calendar). 
> 
>  

-- 
JD Pflugrath
 Value | Results
Direct: +001.678.685.8882
Ofc: 1.866.963.2546
Managing Director
Algoloma Systems, LLC


More information about the Ale mailing list