[ale] [OT] FCC and Net Neutrality and Verizon's response

[Pete Hardie]

But allowing corporations to implement secret regulations is better?
Especially corporations that have monopolies/duopolies?

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Michael Nolan <michaeldnolan at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Regardless of your stance on "Net Neutrality" (whatever that is...)
> allowing the appointed commissions to implement secret regulations is
> stupid.
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Pete Hardie <pete.hardie at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> If they don't like the 1930's law on telephony, perhaps we should use the
>> 1890's law against monopolies on them?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Apparently, using a law from the 1930's is viewed as bad by the crowd
>>> that want's to find ways to weasel more money out of the Internet access we
>>> already pay dearly for. So in response to ISP's being classified as Title
>>> II "common carriers", Verizon published their opinion of the new ruling in
>>> Morse Code.
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
>


-- 
Pete Hardie
--------
Better Living Through Bitmaps
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20150226/1f85ac40/attachment.html>