[ale] Ruby vs C, a non-technical chat
James Sumners
james.sumners at gmail.com
Thu Aug 6 13:36:02 EDT 2015
I'm merely commenting on the difference between "X environment exists on
the destination" versus "once the application is there, it's there."
On Thursday, August 6, 2015, Michael Trausch <mike at trausch.us> wrote:
> Well, yes.
>
> But the same workflow should be used in production either way, most of the
> time, don't you think?
>
> I have hot patched my shipped programs without recompiling, for trivial
> modifications. But then I go back and update the source code and redeploy
> when it is convenient anyway, because I like to have an observable history
> in git.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Aug 6, 2015, at 1:05 PM, James Sumners <james.sumners at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','james.sumners at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> Except, the Ruby program can be edited on the destination system if need
> be. The Go program, in the described scenario, would have to be edited and
> recompiled elsewhere.
>
>
--
James Sumners
http://james.sumners.info/ (technical profile)
http://jrfom.com/ (personal site)
http://haplo.bandcamp.com/ (band page)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20150806/82254da1/attachment.html>
More information about the Ale
mailing list