[ale] {Disarmed} Re: ip over serial

Boris Borisov bugyatl at gmail.com
Sun Oct 26 16:16:17 EDT 2014


... But is good way to remind myself what the internet speeds used to look
like ... I havent seen slow loading jpg for a while. I think to show it to
my kids ... Bad grades in school - a day with slow internet :)

On Friday, October 24, 2014, Boris Borisov <bugyatl at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've got my mistake. Syntax is pointopoint not pointtopoint. Busybox
> ifconfig does not generate error but the "normal" one gives you unknown
> hostname pointtopoint. Learn from mistakes ...
>
> On Thursday, October 23, 2014, Boris Borisov <bugyatl at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bugyatl at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Any info is welcome ... Thanks
>>
>> On Thursday, October 23, 2014, Michael Trausch <mike at trausch.us> wrote:
>>
>>> If possible, use PPP.
>>>
>>> Can post setup info tomorrow if desired. I used to use it both over
>>> serial and over UDP for tunnels before I started using better methods for
>>> VPN.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> > On Oct 23, 2014, at 7:09 PM, "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw at WittsEnd.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 17:13 -0400, Jim Kinney wrote:
>>> >> Doesn't sl0 need to be in a different network from the ptp address? So
>>> >> MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious: 10.10.11.1
>>> >> for sl0
>>> >
>>> > No but there's no netmask specified and, seriously, SLIP?  Good god
>>> that
>>> > brings back old ancient nightmares.
>>> >
>>> > I remember Novell IPX (old IPX/SPX) had checksums disabled and relied,
>>> > instead, on the link layer checksumming for performance reasons.  SLIP
>>> > (as opposed to PPP) had no checksumming on the link layer.  What could
>>> > possibly go wrong.  I would never use SLIP in production.
>>> >
>>> >> On October 23, 2014 4:50:46 PM EDT, Boris Borisov <bugyatl at gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>        I'm doind the old
>>> >>        slattach sl0 -p cslip -s 19200 /dev/ttyS0
>>> >>        ifconfig sl0 10.10.10.1 pointtopoint 10.10.10.2 up
>>> >>        But sl0 gets 10,10.10.2 address
>>> >>        What could be wrong
>>> >>        Bad ifconfig in busybox maybe?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Jim Kinney
>>> >> Linux Systems Analyst
>>> >> Physicist/Brewer
>>> >> http://jimkinney.us
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Mike
>>> > --
>>> > Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
>>> >   /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |
>>> http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
>>> >   NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best
>>> of all
>>> > PGP Key: 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of
>>> it!
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Ale mailing list
>>> > Ale at ale.org
>>> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>>> > See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>>> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ale mailing list
>>> Ale at ale.org
>>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>


-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20141026/510784ca/attachment.html>


More information about the Ale mailing list