[ale] [OT] White House Petition to Legalize Mobile-Phone Unlocking

Tim Watts tim at cliftonfarm.org
Sat Mar 9 12:28:57 EST 2013


True, but at the WH's prodding they've basically agreed it's a
boneheaded policy and will revisit it.

But yeah, it did cause me a minor head explosion to learn that Congress
has delegated a good chunk of law making to the LoC. WTF.


On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 11:34 -0500, Charles Shapiro wrote:
> Hah hah. Too bad it's not *up* to the White House. The library of
> Congress is part of the legislative branch.  
> 
> 
> -- CHS
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Scott Plante <splante at insightsys.com>
> wrote:
>         
>         Looks like the petition is having some effect.
>         
>         http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323494504578340623936989386.html
>         
>         =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
>         
>         White House Backs Phone 'Unlocking'
>         
>         WASHINGTON—Americans should be able to take their used
>         cellphones and tablets freely from one wireless carrier to
>         another if they aren't under contract, the White House said
>         Monday, offering the latest victory to Internet activists
>         seeking to shape U.S. technology policy.
>         ...
>         The White House said consumers should still be required to
>         honor service agreements.
>         ...
>         Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski
>         recently said he intends to look into the issue of unlocked
>         cellphones, a move the White House said it would support. It
>         is unclear what regulatory authority the commission has in
>         this case.
>         The Library of Congress defended its rule-making process in a
>         statement Monday, but it said it agreed that the issue was
>         worthy of further review in the context of telecommunications
>         policy.
>         ...
>         
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         
>         From: "Brian Mathis" <brian.mathis+ale at betteradmin.com>
>         To: "Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts" <ale at ale.org>
>         Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:09:11 PM
>         Subject: Re: [ale] [OT] White House Petition to Legalize
>         Mobile-Phone Unlocking
>         
>         Yes, AFAIK, jailbreaking phones is still legal, but that
>         doesn't mean
>         the manufacturer has to make it easy or even possible.
>         
>         Jailbreak = getting out of chroot so you can do other things
>         with the phone
>         Unlock = Phone will only receive service on the carrier the
>         phone is locked to
>         
>         
>         ❧ Brian Mathis
>         
>         
>         On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Charles Shapiro
>         <hooterpincher at gmail.com> wrote:
>         > What? My understanding was that the DMCA provision affected
>         *only
>         > unlocking* the phone, and that rooting it or installing a
>         3rd-party OS was
>         > still legal ( although it could theoretically expose you to
>         civil suit).
>         > That said, my desultory research shows it _is_ illegal to
>         jailbreak your
>         > tablet.
>         >
>         >
>         http://gizmodo.com/5955130/jailbreaking-is-now-legal-for-smartphonesbut-not-tablets?tag=dmca
>         >
>         > Not that any of this makes sense.
>         >
>         > -- CHS
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Jim Kinney
>         <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:
>         >>
>         >> Reread the rules. You can't root a phone that under
>         discount-based
>         >> contract. It doesn't belong to you until the contract is
>         over. It's a lease
>         >> to own.
>         >>
>         >> Yes, I want to remove the facebook app that Verizon
>         installs by default on
>         >> my jelly-bean phone. But I can't until I own it free and
>         clear.
>         >>
>         >> This doesn't mean I shouldn't be able to require customer
>         service from
>         >> Verizon and demand they remove the app I don''t want so I
>         have more
>         >> resources for what I do want.
>         >>
>         >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Brian Mathis
>         >> <brian.mathis+ale at betteradmin.com> wrote:
>         >>>
>         >>> Why should you need to ask permission to unlock your
>         phone? You paid
>         >>> for it. If you want to break the contract that's fine, but
>         you would
>         >>> be subject to a termination fee which should cover the
>         subsidy. And
>         >>> since most contracts already have large termination fees,
>         they can't
>         >>> argue that it's about that.
>         >>>
>         >>> Worse is that the phone is still locked after the contract
>         is over.
>         >>> If I want to sell my old phone, I need to hope that the
>         phone company
>         >>> will give their blessing, and many have rules that you
>         must have an
>         >>> active account, it must be in good standing, etc... in
>         order to unlock
>         >>> it. This is *after* you have paid off the contract and
>         probably
>         >>> signed onto a new one with a new device.
>         >>>
>         >>> The only reason is to increase the friction for you
>         leaving for
>         >>> another carrier, and that is anti-consumer and can only
>         happen in an
>         >>> oligopolistic market.
>         >>>
>         >>>
>         >>> ❧ Brian Mathis
>         >>>
>         >>> P.S. Why does my phone bill not go down after I have
>         supposedly paid
>         >>> off the subsidy? Because the prices of non-contract phones
>         are
>         >>> inflated on purpose as an incentive to sign a contract.
>         >>>
>         >>>
>         >>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:44 AM, JD <jdp at algoloma.com>
>         wrote:
>         >>> > Or we can just purchase unlocked phones. There are lots
>         of choices.
>         >>> > Nobody forces anyone to buy a subsidized phone, though
>         the fact that cell
>         >>> > plans do not include a BYOD discount is a problem.
>         >>> >
>         >>> > Last fall, I contacted t-mobile to get a locked phone
>         unlocked prior to
>         >>> > an overseas trip. About 5 days later an email arrived
>         with the unlock code.
>         >>> > No real difficulty at all, except the wait.
>         >>> >
>         >>> > Remember when cell phones were a convenience?
>         >>> >
>         >>>
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Ale mailing list
>         Ale at ale.org
>         http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>         See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>         http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>         
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20130309/7272bfab/attachment.sig>


More information about the Ale mailing list