[ale] Do all new large SATA drives suck?

[Geoffrey Myers]

Geoffrey Myers wrote:
> Jeff Hubbs wrote:
>>   Consider that the vast majority of people buy and use those drives 
>> without incident and never think to put a review saying so on any one 
>> particular vendor site.
> 
> My thinking as well.  People don't post about things that don't work.

People don't ost about things that DO work.
Jeese, and I've already had my coffee this morning.

> 
>> On 3/2/12 11:18 AM, Neal Rhodes wrote:
>>> I've gone ahead and ordered an HP core i3 system to be our next Centos 
>>> home/office server.
>>>
>>> It's  got a 1.5TB drive; normally on these off-lease units I'd buy two 
>>> brand new drives and mirror them.  Or that's what we've done with the 
>>> last 3 linux servers.     All of which are still technically 
>>> functioning since Fedora core 1.
>>>
>>> This drive is likely about a year old, so I'm thinking I'll just buy a 
>>> new 1.5TB drive and install Centos to mirror the primary.
>>>
>>> When I look at the crop of 1 - 1.5TB drives on TigerDirect and read 
>>> the reviews, they seem to be uniformly terrible - DOA,  failed after 3 
>>> weeks, replacement failed after a week, etc.  Seagate seems to be the 
>>> worst, although WD not too far behind.
>>>
>>> Ummm, isn't one of the primary selling features of a disk drive that 
>>> it's not supposed to blow up and take down all your data with it?    
>>> Has there been a massive quality slip in the last couple years since I 
>>> last bought drives?    Seriously -  I can lose a power supply, a 
>>> motherboard, a display - you name it, and once I replace it I can 
>>> expect to still have the data.    Yes, I should do backups, and I do, 
>>> and yes, I should mirror the drives, and I do.    I should do SMARTD 
>>> monitoring and I do.  But isn't this like selling tires that tend to 
>>> shred randomly?    Isn't not blowing up catastrophically with no 
>>> warning beforehand a basic selling point for disk drives?    What's 
>>> the point of mirroring if the odds are good that both drives will fail 
>>> completely the same week?   What's the point of SMARTD monitoring if 
>>> the darn drive quits without warning?
>>>
>>> Does anybody make a decent drive in that size range?    
>>>
>>> I'm thinking that not even considering economy,  my old theory of 
>>> buying a pair of new identical drives may not be wise anymore, and 
>>> sticking with one drive that has lasted over a year and one new drive 
>>> is a better plan.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Neal
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ale mailing list
>>> Ale at ale.org
>>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
> 
> 


-- 
Until later, Geoffrey

"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson