[ale] cheap android tablets source

[Jim Kinney]

but, but, <blink> tags were so _cool_!

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:06 AM, rhia <rhiannen at atlantacon.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 08:03 -0500, Geoffrey Myers wrote:
> > Ron Frazier (ALE) wrote:
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > I went to the Atlanta Mobile Developers meeting tonight.  A guy there
> > > told me about this source for inexpensive Android tablets.  So, I'm
> > > passing it along.
> > >
> > > http://cheapestandroid.com/
> >
> > No reflection on you Ron...
> >
> > <rant>
> >
> > That is the worst website I have ever seen.  The continuous sliding back
> > and forth makes me want to vomit.
> >
> > Why do people build pages like this trash.
> >
> > </rant>
>
>
> Bad design, yes, but have seen much worse. Just bite the bullet and
> click on one of the two directional arrows to make the sliding stop.
> However, I will join with ranting about sites that force you to click on
> a directional arrow to make movement stop, sites that automatically load
> sound, sites that hide the sound controls in tiny little print, or
> worse, sites that don't give any option to turn off the sound, or
> motion, or both, at all.
>
> And I don't blame the designers, well, not entirely. Most are just
> trying to collect payment from clueless overly demanding customers.
>
> Ahem,
> However...
> At least make the attempt to convert your customer to more reasonable,
> less bling-filled annoyances. If they won't listen, take the check and
> move on to the next account.
>
> Personally, a main page with sound and animation of any sort annoys me.
> They take longer to load and are far more distracting than enticing. If
> I can't glaringly obviously turn off the movement or sound within the
> first 3 seconds of loading a page, I close it, black-list it, and don't
> go back. So, maybe I might occasionally miss some first run early
> adoption tech. So be it. The way I view it is that if the tech is worth
> adopting it will still be there long enough for more professional
> appearing sites to be built. It's a personal thing, but I refuse to give
> serious attention, let alone hard earned cash, to annoying amateurish
> bling filled animated sites especially in the age of paying for
> bandwidth on smart phones. Site in question (cheapestandroid.com) could
> have had the prominent buttons and let the user decide to click or not.
> (HINT to cheapestandroid - your target audience who have found your site
> are perfectly capable of clicking the arrow buttons. Promise.)
>
> When I click on a link for information, whether or not buying is an
> option, that's exactly what I want: Information. Not animation, not
> sound, not bling, just plain ol' generic information. Occasionally small
> footprint images for clarification. Put the fancy stuff, if it has to be
> there at all, off the front page, thankyouverymuch.
>
> ----
> rhia
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>



-- 
-- 
James P. Kinney III

As long as the general population is passive, apathetic, diverted to
consumerism or hatred of the vulnerable, then the powerful can do as they
please, and those who survive will be left to contemplate the outcome.
- *2011 Noam Chomsky

http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20120302/7e4458fb/attachment-0001.html