[ale] [OT] AT&T/UVerse going to carrier grade NAT?

[Jay Lozier]

On 06/07/2012 06:58 AM, Michael Campbell wrote:
> ALErs,
>
> A buddy of mine on UVerse received a notice that he would have to
> change his LAN from 10/8 to 192.168/16 for some "improvements" that
> AT&T was about to roll out 6-Jul.
>
> The buzz on "dslreports.com <http://dslreports.com>" is that AT&T is
> moving to a carrier grade NAT setup, and will be issuing all
> subscribers a 10/8 address, resulting in subscribers no longer having
> a publicly visible IP (static or not).
>
> I run a few minor servers on my home machine(s), and this will affect
> me in big ways if I can't get to them from "outside".
>
> Was wondering if anyone here knew anything about it, and/or if there
> are any tricks with ssh and tunneling to get "back in".  (My thought
> was to ssh to a publicly available machine from my home server with
> some reverse tunnels back to my home server, then talk to the publicly
> available machine on the ports I reverse tunneled - would that work?)
>
> Thoughts welcome.
Does publicly visible mean an open, non-commercial WIFI? To many people
use a secured WIFI in their homes to allow them to move around with
having to run cables everywhere.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo


-- 
Jay Lozier
jslozier at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20120607/0164d1d1/attachment.html