[ale] BIND split view on secondary/slave server

Lightner, Jeff jlightner at water.com
Thu Jan 27 13:04:58 EST 2011


I'm saying to me it would seem simpler to do it that way.   Just because
you setup most zones to transfer from master doesn't mean you have to
set them all up that way.   However, I noted you CAN set them up on the
master and transfer them.   Also as noted I do all my zones so haven't
tried what you want to do.

-----Original Message-----
From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of
Michael B. Trausch
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 11:29 AM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] BIND split view on secondary/slave server

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 11:08 -0500, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> I've done the split views on master/slave but haven't tried setting up
> so that only the slave has the split.
> 
> To use split views on both master and slave I left my original IPs
> (internal and external since it is DMZ host) then added virtual IPs on
> the same NICs.  This is because You have to use separate IPs for each
> view to allow the transfer from slave to master.
> 
> However, since the split is defined in the named.conf and the
> designation of slave zone is also defined in named.conf on the slave
> it seems you should be able to set up separate views that way so long
> as you are updating the special view zones on the slave rather than
> trying to transfer them.   (If you want to transfer then you WILL have
> to setup on the master but you ought to be able to tell the master
> that everyone sees your default view and only setup the special view
> to allow for transfer.)

So instead of transferring them, it'd be easier to just maintain the
slave view as a separate zone for which the slave server is the master?

I am starting to remember why I disliked BIND... It'd be nice if a RR
could have a qualifier attached to it, where you could say "return this
one only if the inquirer is in a.b.c.d/e range" and have that replicate.
I am a big fan of All In One Place, but I am also a big fan of Not More
Complex Than Strictly Necessary.

	--- Mike
 
Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
 
Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------



More information about the Ale mailing list