[ale] What's Better? Convirt 2.0 or virt-manager on CentOS 5.3 and Fedora 14?
scott mcbrien
smcbrien at gmail.com
Tue Feb 15 19:14:40 EST 2011
I'd say don't rely on virt-manager at all. Instead leverage the power
of KVM on the command-line through virsh. If you want something
that's more VMware-like for work there's Red Hat Enterprise
Virtualization, which is a pay-for product that uses a .net based
webui for managing virtual machines running on RHEL and KVM.
-Scott
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Jim Lynch
<ale_nospam at fayettedigital.com> wrote:
> gene.poole at macys.com wrote:
>> The subject says it all. I'm very familiar with VMware vCenter, but
>> now I'd like to get to know virtual machine management from a Linux
>> console. Which is the better product on my CentOS 5.3 and my Fedora
>> 14 work stations?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gene Poole
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>>
> Don't know the answer but did you work for SGI?
>
> Jim.
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
More information about the Ale
mailing list