[ale] Opinions for a two node Active-Passive/Failover System.

[Dennis Ruzeski]

For what application? Are you going to fail over storage?

--Dennis



On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:54 PM, C Hendry <gchendry at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Opinions for a two node Active-Passive/Fail-over System.
>
>
>
> Preferences:
>
> 1. I’d like to use a dedicated NIC with cross-over cable for the heartbeat
> messages.
>
> 2. I’d like the ability to power fence (STONITH) using IPMI enabled
> motherboards over ethernet.
>
>
>
>
>
> Have been looking at Redhat Cluster Suite.
>
> I understand that a lot of people define a cluster to be a system of 3 or
> more nodes and no less.
>
> RHCS does appear well tested, but appears not to be able to do preference
> #1.
>
>
>
> Have been looking at Heart-beat with Pacemaker.
>
> Looks to be what I want so far.
>
>
>
>
>
> What are others using?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
>