[ale] Virtualization question

Lightner, Jeff jlightner at water.com
Mon Nov 8 08:44:52 EST 2010


Given that many things made for "open systems" have Windows management
stations or tools I don't think it's fair to chide VMware for it.
VMWare of course allows for Windows guest systems as well and many folks
that use it ONLY use it for Windows guests. 

 

What really got me was when HP started making HP-UX management tools
that only ran on Windows.  Go figure.

 

________________________________

From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of
Joshua Kite
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 9:46 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] Virtualization question

 

Unfortunately VMWare has not moved away from their Windows-only tool.
It's a bad choice, and I don't understand why a thick client is required
to simply manage guests.  I can understand it for conversions, etc., but
not for management.

I haven't had a chance to play with the SDK.  Supposedly there is one
for Linux, but I haven't worked with it yet.

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Richard Bronosky <Richard at bronosky.com>
wrote:

Has VMWare fixed the situation of their management tool (VSphere if I
remember correctly) only running on windows? I don't care how great
their product looks. It is just plain stupid to make your software
only run on the OS of a company who has entered the market for the
purpose of shutting down your business. I don't use products by
organizations who demonstrate such stupidity.


On 11/6/10, Joshua Kite <jwkite at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you both for your replies.  I just realized that I had a
> misunderstanding about the vmware license.  I'm going to give that one
more
> try.
>
> This is the first that I've heard about LXC.  That's very interesting
> functionality, but I have to read up on it more.  KVM and VirtualBox
are
> probably good choices if ESXi doesn't work out for me.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Josh Kite
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:09 PM, John Scott <John.Scott at peak10.com>
wrote:
>
>>  If you want easy with x86 compatibility and not have to change your
base
>> OS preference, check into VirtualBox.  You can get the host
hypervisor via
>> apt-get on ubuntu and there is good documentation available on
>> virtualbox.org.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] *On Behalf
Of
>> *Joshua
>> Kite
>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 06, 2010 11:02 AM
>> *To:* Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
>> *Subject:* [ale] Virtualization question
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am looking for advice on how to set up some virtual environments
for use
>> at home.
>>
>> I have a server, and I want it to have two distinct functions.  One
is
>> network filtering, etc. using squid and some other applications.  The
>> other
>> is my basic web/file/print server.  I may want to play with something
else
>> in the future, so virtualization seems like the right choice.
>>
>> The hardware that I have available is a dual xeon hyperthreaded 32
bit
>> machine.  And that's the problem.  I would like to run a bare-metal
>> hypervisor, but all of the current ones seem to be for 64-bit only.
That
>> makes sense, but it doesn't work for me.  I actually installed the
>> previous
>> version of VMWare's ESXi only to find out that the free license will
only
>> allow me to make use of one of the processors once the trial period
is up.
>>
>> So the next option appears to be a light OS for a host system with a
>> hypervisor running inside of it.  I have run Ubuntu for both desktop
and
>> server for the past 5 or so years, but I am willing to consider other
>> distributions for both host and guest for the network filtering OS.
I'll
>> probably use Ubuntu for the web/file/print functionality since I'm
most
>> familiar with it.
>>
>> I have been fighting with my home server for weeks after a crash, and
I'm
>> kind of tired of playing with it, so I am looking for a very dumbed
down,
>> easy solution with step by step instructions for installation and
>> automatic
>> startup of guests.
>>
>> Do any of you have recommendations?
>>
>> Thank you very much,
>>
>> Josh Kite
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>>
>>
>

--
Sent from my mobile device

.!# RichardBronosky #!.

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
 
Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
 
Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20101108/067441dc/attachment.html 


More information about the Ale mailing list